Search site:

Story Archive

Top Daily Blogs

  • No Results
Billing War Heroes: A Change We Don't Believe In
1 salute

The following was adapted from an op-ed that appeared in the March 18 issue of The Wall Street Journal.

By National Commander David K. Rehbein

"If you were injured in Iraq or Afghanistan and you have not paid your co-pay, please press 1. If you were injured during military training and you have not yet reached your deductible, please press 2. If your family has reached its maximum insurance benefit, please call back after you have purchased additional coverage. Thank you for your service."

Before I met with President Obama in the White House on March 16, I would have thought a phone call like what I describe above would be unimaginable. Now it is all too possible.

President Obama made clear during our discussion that he intends to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans with service-connected disabilities. This plan is as unfair as it is unnecessary. According to the U.S. Constitution, it is the president and Congress who send troops in harm's way, not the CEO of Blue Cross Blue Shield.

As head of the nation's largest veterans organization, I was startled by this radical shift of position the president has taken. In October, candidate Obama listed several proposals he had for VA and none of them included billing veterans' insurance providers. In fact, when asked how he would improve the funding formula for VA's health care system, then-Sen. Obama told The American Legion Magazine, "It starts with the president saying that if I'm budgeting for war, then I am also budgeting for VA. If I've got a half-a-trillion-dollar Pentagon budget, then I'd better make sure that I make some of those billions of dollars available to care for the soldiers once they come home. It should be a non-negotiable proposition that people are receiving the services that they need. This is the reason I joined the Veterans Affairs Committee - because I believe deeply in that principle."

President Obama has mentioned that he has read "Team of Rivals," a book about the presidency of another man from Illinois that Obama clearly admires. During his second inaugural address, President Lincoln said, "Let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."

By abandoning its responsibilities to the heroic men and women who answered our nation's call, the federal government is breaking Lincoln's sacred promise. Moreover, it is unnecessary.

The 2.6 million member American Legion has long advocated for Medicare to reimburse VA for its treatment of Medicare-eligible veterans. Veterans pay into the Medicare-system, yet they are unable to use their benefits in the VA health system, which was created specifically for them. The Indian Health Service is successfully billing and collecting needed revenue for both Medicare and Medicaid. We also believe that direct billing between two federal agencies will reduce the opportunities for waste, fraud and abuse that tend to occur when for-profit corporations enter the mix.

Perhaps nobody would be hit harder by the Obama administration's proposal than the thousands of veterans who own small businesses. Not only will their private insurance premiums be drastically elevated to cover service-connected disabilities, but many will be forced to cut staff as a result. The unemployment rate for veterans may climb even higher, as businesses avoid hiring these heroes for fear of the impact they would have on insurance rates.

Our military veterans have already served this country. They have given us their blood, sweat and devotion. Under President Obama's proposal, the most severely wounded veterans could easily exceed their maximum insurance benefit, leaving their family without any additional coverage. This is hardly the thanks of a grateful nation.

 

Name Names please
Submitted by Anonymous on November 16, 2009 - 5:56 pm
The dolt who came up with this plan should be publicly named, and not be able to hide behind the anonymity of his postion in government, politics or as a lobbyist.
One Veteran tired of this fear mongering
Submitted by Anonymous on March 18, 2009 - 3:44 pm
The VA is already billing private insurance companies and has done so for years and the sky has not fallen in, and vets have not paid out of pocket and rates have not increased and veteran owned buinesses have not gone bankrupt. As to hiring veterans, Non-veterans don't hire veterans unless they have no choice. Like it or not its a fact of life. You will find many veterans, not here of course, not seeing a lot wrong with the proposal other than the way some veteran groups have presented it.
It's wrong
Submitted by Anonymous on March 18, 2009 - 4:23 pm
On principle your wrong and at the least your moral compus is broke if you think a veteran identified as service connected should have a private insurance company pay the medical bills. I'm service connected and I feel that the federal government is passing the buck....It feels wrong that the federal govt is turning their backs on veterans and looking at ways to cut corners at our expense. Veterans and their families give..Lets just make sure they give a little more to the country. *Tom Newman
Amen to that Brother
Submitted by Anonymous on August 25, 2009 - 11:59 am
Amen to that Brother
You cannot speak for other
Submitted by Anonymous on March 18, 2009 - 4:16 pm
You cannot speak for other veterans! It would be unethical to change what has been inplace already in this case. Obama could get the money from AGI. Obama needs to go into meditation and think instead of cutting us all down.
response
Submitted by Anonymous on March 18, 2009 - 3:51 pm
Sir, You make me sick.
Me too
Submitted by Anonymous on June 8, 2009 - 6:12 pm
Me too!!! You may be commander in cheif, but oh what a jerk! Tell us, how much time you served, and what branch of the service you were in? Where do you get these wild ideas?
A Combat Veterans view
Submitted by nfox on March 18, 2009 - 5:17 pm
I am a Vietnam Combat Veteran. with a service connected disability. Do we as Veterans want some private insurance company determining what care we need. Most Doctors at the VA will tell you us Veterans have different health issues than civilians. Having fought with the private issurance companies for years I can assure you we don't want them involved in any way with treatment for service connected disabilities. Nelson Fox
B.H.O
Submitted by Anonymous on March 19, 2009 - 11:56 pm
That's all we need , an insurance bean counter telling us what is allowed or how much it will cost us or that they are allowed to spend on us to keep us going B.S.! The new POTUS is a POOPHEAD! He talks the talk but he certainly don't walk the walk .
apologies from a civilian
Submitted by Anonymous on March 21, 2009 - 4:01 pm
During the election, although there was not much on the menu, I voted against Obama.Obama voted for the bailout (they could've saved taxpayers $700 billion by suspending the mark to market rule to make the banks solvent), Obama voted for massive pork in the stimulus and the $410 Omnibus earmark bill. The cost of taking care of vets can't be $700 billion dollars. We prefer that you get proper medical care before TARP gets our money. Our prayers are with you.
I can't believe how much we
Submitted by Anonymous on February 11, 2010 - 12:38 pm
I can't believe how much we humans have advanced in every aspect. Billing war heroes through tech! I find it funny however. Now those of you would argue with me on that check this out once again. See the agony as well as humor inside. Atlas America
arlier this week, Israel
Submitted by Anonymous on November 24, 2009 - 6:06 am
arlier this week, Israel succeeded in killing Salah Shehada, a savage Hamas mastermind, and one of his top aides. A dozen Palestinian civilians died in the attack, including members of bad credit loans. The civilian deaths may be lamentable, but they also were justifiable. A terrorist leader used his relatives and neighbors as shields, and they died with him. Their deaths were Shehada's fault, not Israel's.
I dont understand why Barack
Submitted by Anonymous on February 12, 2010 - 10:21 am
I dont understand why Barack Obama took such a plan. In my opinion there is absolutely no reason why somebody should pay for somebody else's dues. I mean why on earth should private life insurance companies pay for the veteran's treatment? Atlas Insurance / Angioplasty /